[1]赵聪.《四库全书总目》对庾信及其骈文的评价[J].扬州职业大学学报扬州教育学院学报,2022,(04):19-23.
　ZHAO Cong.A Brief Analysis of the Evaluation on Yu Xin and His Parallel Prose in The General Catalogue of Siku Quanshu[J].Journal of Yangzhou Polytechnic College,2022,(04):19-23.
点击复制

《四库全书总目》对庾信及其骈文的评价()
分享到：

《扬州职业大学学报》《扬州教育学院学报》[ISSN:1008-3693/CN:32-1529/G4]

卷:
期数:
2022年04期
页码:
19-23
栏目:
《扬州教育学院学报》刊期目录
出版日期:
2022-12-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
A Brief Analysis of the Evaluation on Yu Xin and His Parallel Prose in The General Catalogue of Siku Quanshu
文章编号:
1008-6536(2022)04-0019-05
作者:
赵聪
(南宁师范大学,广西南宁530299)
Author(s):
ZHAO Cong
(Nanning Normal University, Nanning 530299, China)
关键词:
《四库全书总目》;  庾信;  骈文;  评价
Keywords:
The General Catalogue of Siku Quanshu;  Yu Xin;  parallel prose;  evaluation
分类号:
G 257
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
《四库全书总目》中对庾信的评价代表了清代学者对庾信以及六朝骈文的态度,四库馆臣对于庾信与六朝文学并非持一味否决的偏激态度,而是承认六朝骈文的地位,对庾信的评价也相对客观。也正是因为清人注重吸收六朝文学的可取之处,确立了六朝骈文为正统的审美典范,为骈文研究提供了理论支撑,骈文在清中叶得以复兴。
Abstract:
The evaluation of Yu Xin in The General Catalogue of Siku Quanshu represents the attitude of scholars in the Qing Dynasty towards Yu Xin and the parallel prose of the Six Dynasties. The officials of the Siku Quanshu Institute did not blindly repel Yu Xin and the parallel prose of the Six Dynasties, but recognized the status of the parallel prose of the Six Dynasties, and their evaluation of Yu Xin was relatively objective. It was precisely the attention the Qing scholars paid to the merits of the literature of the Six Dynasties that established the status of the parallel prose of the Six Dynasties as the orthodox aesthetic model and provided theoretical support for the study of the parallel prose, enabling its revival in the middle of the Qing Dynasty.

参考文献/References:

[1] 孔颖达.春秋左传正义[M]//阮元.十三经注疏.北京:中华书局,1980.
[2] 永瑢,纪昀.四库全书总目[M].北京:中华书局,2003.
[3] 莫山洪.骈文学史论稿[M].桂林:广西师范大学出版社,2017.
[4] 陈寿.三国志[M].裴松之,注.北京:中华书局,1982.
[5] 姚思廉.梁书[M].北京:中华书局,1973.
[6] 魏征,令狐德棻.隋书[M].北京:中华书局,1973.
[7] 令狐德棻.周书[M].北京:中华书局,1975.
[8] 王勃.重订新校王子安集[M].何林天,校注.太原:山西人民出版社,1990.
[9] 卉君.杜甫[M].北京:商务印书馆,1979.
[10] 钱穆.论语新解[M].北京:九州出版社,2011.
[11] 张清娥,方彬.论孔子尚用崇实的文艺美学观[J].江西行政学院学报,2005(4):80-81.
[12] 庾信.庾子山集注[M].倪璠,注.北京:中华书局,1980.
[13] 陈寅恪.金明馆丛稿初编[M].北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2015.
[14] 焦循.孟子正义[M].十三经清人注疏本.
[15] 曹顺庆.中西比较诗学[M].北京:北京出版社,2010.
[16] 王国维.人间词话[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2014.
[17] 钟涛.六朝骈文形式及其文化意蕴[M].上海:东方出版社,1997.
[18] 刘麟生.中国骈文史[M].北京:东方出版社,1996.
[19] 杨慎.升庵诗话笺证[M].王仲镛,笺证.上海:上海古籍出版社,1987.
[20] 陈维崧.陈维崧集[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2010.
[21] 曾燠.国朝骈体正宗评本[M].花雨楼朱墨套印本,清光绪十年(1884).
[22] 许楗.六朝文絜笺注 [M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1962.
[23] 孙梅. 四六丛话[M].上海: 商务印书馆,1937.
[24] 孙德谦.六朝丽指[M].台北:新兴书局,1963.
[25] 刘熙载.艺概[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1978.

相似文献/References:

[1]荆建勋.论《四库全书总目》史部存在的缺陷及原因—以地理类为例[J].扬州职业大学学报扬州教育学院学报,2022,(04):14.
　JING Jian-xun.On the Defects and Their Causes of the History Department of the General Catalogue of Siku Quanshu—Take Geography as an Example[J].Journal of Yangzhou Polytechnic College,2022,(04):14.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2022-03-11
作者简介:赵 聪(1998—),女,南宁师范大学文学院硕士研究生。
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01